Now Playing Tracks

The writer’s editor: a project | Bothersome Words

Writer types! I’d still love to talk to you about a project I’m doing. All fields and genres; anything you think is missing from the services and processes already available.
Do you have any thoughts or wishes? If you could go to one place for all your writing/publishing support, needs, and questions, what would that place look like?

Writing Advice: by Chuck Palahniuk

In six seconds, you’ll hate me.
But in six months, you’ll be a better writer.

From this point forward—at least for the next half year—you may not use “thought” verbs. These include: Thinks, Knows, Understands, Realizes, Believes, Wants, Remembers, Imagines, Desires, and a hundred others you love to use.

The list should also include: Loves and Hates.
And it should include: Is and Has, but we’ll get to those later.

Until some time around Christmas, you can’t write: Kenny wondered if Monica didn’t like him going out at night…”

Instead, you’ll have to Un-pack that to something like: “The
mornings after Kenny had stayed out, beyond the last bus, until he’d had to bum a ride or pay for a cab and got home to find Monica faking sleep, faking because she never slept that quiet, those mornings, she’d only put her own cup of coffee in the microwave. Never his.”

Instead of characters knowing anything, you must now present the details that allow the reader to know them. Instead of a character wanting something, you must now describe the thing so that the reader wants it.

Instead of saying: “Adam knew Gwen liked him.” You’ll have to say: “Between classes, Gwen had always leaned on his locker when he’d go to open it. She’s roll her eyes and shove off with one foot, leaving a black-heel mark on the painted metal, but she also left the smell of her perfume. The combination lock would still be warm from her butt. And the next break, Gwen would be leaned there, again.”

In short, no more short-cuts. Only specific sensory detail: action, smell, taste, sound, and feeling.

Typically, writers use these “thought” verbs at the beginning of a paragraph (In this form, you can call them “Thesis Statements” and I’ll rail against those, later). In a way, they state the intention of the paragraph. And what follows, illustrates them.

For example:
“Brenda knew she’d never make the deadline. was backed up from the bridge, past the first eight or nine exits. Her cell phone battery was dead. At home, the dogs would need to go out, or there would be a mess to clean up. Plus, she’d promised to water the plants for her neighbor…”

Do you see how the opening “thesis statement” steals the thunder of what follows? Don’t do it.

If nothing else, cut the opening sentence and place it after all the others. Better yet, transplant it and change it to: Brenda would never make the deadline.

Thinking is abstract. Knowing and believing are intangible. Your story will always be stronger if you just show the physical actions and details of your characters and allow your reader to do the thinking and knowing. And loving and hating.

Don’t tell your reader: “Lisa hated Tom.”

Instead, make your case like a lawyer in court, detail by detail.

Present each piece of evidence. For example: “During roll call, in the breath after the teacher said Tom’s name, in that moment before he could answer, right then, Lisa would whisper-shout ‘Butt Wipe,’ just as Tom was saying, ‘Here’.”

One of the most-common mistakes that beginning writers make is leaving their characters alone. Writing, you may be alone. Reading, your audience may be alone. But your character should spend very, very little time alone. Because a solitary character starts thinking or worrying or wondering.

For example: Waiting for the bus, Mark started to worry about how long the trip would take…”

A better break-down might be: “The schedule said the bus would come by at noon, but Mark’s watch said it was already 11:57. You could see all the way down the road, as far as the Mall, and not see a bus. No doubt, the driver was parked at the turn-around, the far end of the line, taking a nap. The driver was kicked back, asleep, and Mark was going to be late. Or worse, the driver was drinking, and he’d pull up drunk and charge Mark seventy-five cents for death in a fiery traffic accident…”

A character alone must lapse into fantasy or memory, but even then you can’t use “thought” verbs or any of their abstract relatives.

Oh, and you can just forget about using the verbs forget and remember.

No more transitions such as: “Wanda remembered how Nelson used to brush her hair.”

Instead: “Back in their sophomore year, Nelson used to brush her hair with smooth, long strokes of his hand.”

Again, Un-pack. Don’t take short-cuts.

Better yet, get your character with another character, fast.
Get them together and get the action started. Let their actions and words show their thoughts. You—stay out of their heads.

And while you’re avoiding “thought” verbs, be very wary about using the bland verbs “is” and “have.”

For example:
“Ann’s eyes are blue.”

“Ann has blue eyes.”


“Ann coughed and waved one hand past her face, clearing the cigarette smoke from her eyes, blue eyes, before she smiled…”

Instead of bland “is” and “has” statements, try burying your details of what a character has or is, in actions or gestures. At its most basic, this is showing your story instead of telling it.

And forever after, once you’ve learned to Un-pack your characters, you’ll hate the lazy writer who settles for: “Jim sat beside the telephone, wondering why Amanda didn’t call.”

Please. For now, hate me all you want, but don’t use thought verbs. After Christmas, go crazy, but I’d bet money you won’t.


For this month’s homework, pick through your writing and circle every “thought” verb. Then, find some way to eliminate it. Kill it by Un-packing it.

Then, pick through some published fiction and do the same thing. Be ruthless.

“Marty imagined fish, jumping in the moonlight…”

“Nancy recalled the way the wine tasted…”

“Larry knew he was a dead man…”

Find them. After that, find a way to re-write them. Make them stronger.

Chuck Palahniuk (via oh-humberthumbert)

This is the only piece of “writing advice” that I’ve ever found to be unilaterally useful.

(via impostoradult)

(Source: redactedbeastie)


Jonathan Franzen once said that the more your protagonist resembles yourself, the less advisable it is to write in first person.

It sounds reasonable, but I defy this rule basically every day.

I mean, fuck him. He also says you can get any writing done if you have an internet…

Not sure that I agree with Franzen, but it’s an interesting thing to ponder. If nothing else, it reminds you to check as you go whether your character is reacting in a way true to you, the author, or themselves.

She grabbed my anus and positioned my body in the direction of the east gallery and we started walking.

Automated transcription gone awry. The Guardian, Scanner for ebook cannot tell its ‘arms’ from its ‘anus’.

Evidently, high-end scanners using Optical Character Recognition technology can’t tell heads or tail – or arms and anuses – when going through old-timey type. 

Takeaway: You still need a copyeditor to tell your arms from your anus. With all the news about robots writing our print, there’s something reassuring about that.

(via futurejournalismproject)

thesasswolfinitiative asked:

Hello! I don't want to be invasive so if you would prefer not to answer this I apologise and feel absolutely free to just ignore this, but I was hoping I could ask you about working on TV. I'm from Australia and plan on moving to London after my Honours to work in TV (hopefully writing eventually but I obviously realise this is a long term goal!) I was wondering if you could tell me how you got into the industry (the really beginner part of it - internships, running, etc) and any tips? Thanks!


I hope you don’t mind me answering this publicly! It’s possible that something in this rambling answer might help someone else too

Read More

Valuable advice on getting started writing for TV.

I’m in a different industry, but a lot of this still relates. The *worst* advice I ever got was to hide my real interests and aim for a general or “popular” approach/appeal. I did so much better once I ignored that and, as carrionlaughing says - flew my nerd flag proudly and let my fangirl free.
Let people see your passions. It helps them understand you and you’ve a better shot at finding your perfect fit.




The writer’s editor: a project | Bothersome Words



I’ve always had the best working relationships with editors who are very experienced and who aren’t afraid of just digging in, with good reason of course. I don’t necessarily feel it’s important to have that much in common, in terms of genre, but they need to “get” my writing style and have an appreciation for that. I actually find having some distance in terms of genre can help to tighten up the story sometimes. I absolutely loathe editing though so I need someone who isn’t afraid to get in there and really go to town, and if something isn’t working, I need them to tell me that.

I’ve been very lucky to have had editors at uni who pushed me out of my comfort zone by delivering really well-considered critique and giving me options for expanding my frame of reference, ie reading new authors to see how they handled a situation etc. But the editor also has to be willing to let matters stand if we discussed it and I offered a good argument for it. I crave constructive criticism, that’s always worked for me. I guess the most important thing I look for in an editor is mutual respect and understanding. You both need to be very clear about your relationship and what you expect out of that.

Distance can be really helpful - an editor who is not familiar with a genre might pick up on things that seem obvious to people who know the tropes (for want of a better word). They can sometimes be more likely to notice when a particular aspect needs a more thorough explanation. It means they can help make sure readers who might be new to a genre aren’t alienated by assumed knowledge.

It’s important to work out what you’ll want from the edit though - if you want someone who can fact-check, or who can make sure your work adheres to certain genre-expectations (or challenges them!) it can be helpful to work with someone who does have knowledge and experience of your genre/topic. Otherwise you might find half your edit, and their time, is spent querying or researching things unnecessarily.

Though, again, sometimes really useful considerations can come out of this, so it’s not always a bad thing.


The writer’s editor: a project | Bothersome Words



Writers! What would

Thanks again!
Editors are very well aware of the trust involved in a writer handing over their heart work. I think it is always good if a writer can get a look at an editor’s portfolio and see what other things they’ve worked on. Ask lots of questions, so you can get a feel for personality and approach and, if it’s important to you that they like the same books etc - talk to them. You should work out pretty quickly if they’re on the same wavelength - or whether that will even matter. You may decide it doesn’t because they’re approach is a perfect fit anyway.

In terms of feedback, it’s never simple as “it’s boring”. A good editor should be able to explain why something doesn’t seem to be working for them and give you ideas for how to resolve this. Those ideas may be more or less specific, depending on how you, and your editor, work best.

We make Tumblr themes